The English subjunctive occurs in two forms: the present subjunctive and the past subjunctive. The present subjunctive is derived from the infinitive of a verb and is in the same form for all persons. No distinctions are made between regular and irregular verbs. For example:
| to be | to have | to go | to see | to like | |
| I | be | have | go | see | like |
| You (sing.) | be | have | go | see | like |
| he/ she/ it | be | have | go | see | like |
| we | be | have | go | see | like |
| You (pl.) | be | have | go | see | like |
| they | be | have | go | see | like |
The past subjunctive is derived from the past tense of a verb. In the case of the verb to be, only the plural form (were) is used in the past subjunctive:
| to be | to have | to go | to see | to like | |
| I | were | had | went | saw | liked |
| You (sing.) | were | had | went | saw | liked |
| he/ she/ it | were | had | went | saw | liked |
| we | were | had | went | saw | liked |
| You (pl.) | were | had | went | saw | liked |
| they | were | had | went | saw | liked |
Another form of the past subjunctive is the combination of the auxiliary would and an infinitive:
| to be | to go | to like | |
| I | would be | would go | would like |
| You (sing.) | would be | would go | would like |
| he/ she/ it | would be | would be | would like |
| we | would be | would be | would like |
| You (pl.) | would be | would be | would like |
| they | would be | would be | would like |
The present subjunctive is used in a clause that follows a phrase that states that something is necessary or important:
Other statements that are similar in meaning to those illustrated above can also introduce a present subjunctive clause, such as:
The present subjunctive is also used to describe the action of a verb in a clause that follows statements that contain the verbs ask, command, demand, insist, propose, recommend, request, and suggest:
Notice that the present subjunctive infers that the action of the verb in these sentences is taking place in either the present or the future:
The conjunction “that”, which combines the introductory clause with the present subjunctive clause, is usually optional:
The verb that follows a wish clause is expressed in the past subjunctive. However, the meaning is inferred to be in the present tense. The conjunction that is optional in combining a wish clause with a past subjunctive clause:
If the verb wish is in a form of the past tense, the past subjunctive verb suggests the past tense:
Use the past subjunctive in clauses that are introduced by if and as if. If a single verb is used in the non-if clause, the past subjunctive would is used with the accompanying verb in infinitive form:
When you form an imperative sentence with suppose, the statement that follows is in the past subjunctive with would + an infinitive:
A verb conjugated in a perfect tense (have + past participle) suggests that the action of the verb is in the past tense:
This occurs with if clauses as well:
Note that would is still used in the non-if clause when the verb is in a present perfect-tense form (would have changed).
If clauses are used to set a condition. The accompanying clause states the result that would occur if the condition were met. For example:
| Condition | Result |
| If Jean were here, | she would know what to do. |
| If Jean had been here | she would have known what to do. |
This use of would in a clause that states a result is also used when other auxiliaries are added to the clause. For example:
The inference of the present or the past tense occurs respectively when you use would + an infinitive for the present and would + have + a past participle for the past.
If you spoke German, you would be able to understand Grandfather.
If you had learned German, you would have been able to understand Grandfather.
When the auxiliary can is used in the clause that sets the condition, the auxiliary is in the past subjunctive (could). The accompanying verb is in its infinitive form for the present-tense meaning or formed as have + a past participle for the past-tense meaning. If the clause that states the result contains the auxiliary could, would is not used. Let’s look at some examples:
When have and a past participle follow certain auxiliaries in the past subjunctive, a special meaning is derived. This structure suggests that the action of the verb is imaginary, a desired outcome, or merely a possibility. These auxiliaries are could have, might have, must have, ought to have, and should have. Let’s look at some example sentences:
In many cases, the same phrase can be used with any of the auxiliaries:
.
RSS Feed, Daily Emails, Facebook , Twitter & Google buzz.